Supreme Court Defends MGNREGA: A Lifeline for the Poor or Just Another Scheme?
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court praised the scrapped MGNREGA scheme, raising critical questions about minimum wage laws and government accountability.

Supreme Court Defends MGNREGA: A Lifeline for the Poor or Just Another Scheme?
The Supreme Court has recently lauded the scrapped Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), emphasizing that the scheme should not be viewed as a 'freebie' or exploitation. Advocates Prashant Bhushan, Cheryl D’souza, and Neha Rathi, representing activist Aruna Roy, have urged the court to scrutinize the legality of laws allowing states to set minimum wages below the established threshold.
This ruling raises significant concerns about the commitment of the government to uphold the rights of ordinary citizens, particularly in terms of fair wages and employment opportunities. With millions reliant on such schemes for their livelihood, the questions linger: What was promised by the government? Who is accountable for the scheme's scrapping? And what steps are being taken to ensure that minimum wage laws protect the most vulnerable?
As reported by The Hindu, the court's decision could have lasting implications for workers' rights across India, particularly in rural areas where employment options are limited. The future of employment schemes and the protection of workers' rights hang in the balance, demanding immediate attention from the authorities and the public alike.
Source: The Hindu








