Supreme Court Demands Non-Violent Police Response to Student Protests

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has called for a shift in how police handle student protests, insisting on non-violent approaches. The court emphasized that police should be equipped with protective gear to safeguard their well-being as well. The ruling comes amid growing concerns over the use of pellet guns for crowd control, which have been criticized for violating constitutional principles of necessity, proportionality, and reasonableness.

The petition against pellet guns highlights the urgent need for accountability from the government regarding the methods used in managing protests. As public outcry over police brutality grows, citizens are left wondering: What measures will the government implement to ensure the safety of both protesters and police?

This ruling serves as a stark reminder that the rights of ordinary citizens must be protected and that the state's response to dissent should always prioritize safety and respect for human dignity. The Supreme Court's directive, as reported by The Hindu, raises critical questions about the balance between maintaining order and ensuring civil liberties.

Source: The Hindu